Edinilmiş mallara katılma rejiminde katılma alacağı
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2022
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Edinilmiş mallara katılma rejiminin 01.01.2002 tarihinden itibaren yürürlüğe girmesiyle birlikte mal rejimi konusunda önemli gelişmeler olmuştur. Edinilmiş mallara katılma rejimi, kadın-erkek eşitliği noktasında önemli fayda ve kazanımlar sağlamış olsa da uygulamada bazı zorluklar yaşanmaktadır. Bu makaleyi hazırlamadaki amacımız “Katılma Alacağı” konusunu doktrindeki görüş ayrılıkları ve Yargıtay kararları doğrultusunda incelemektir. Özellikle bazı konularda farklı görüşlerin olması uygulamada birtakım sorunları da beraberinde getirmektedir. Amaç: Çalışmada, kanundaki değişiklik sonucu yasal mal rejimi olarak kabul edilmesiyle birlikte önemli noktaya gelen katılma alacağı konusunun incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışma hazırlanırken, edinilmiş mallara katılma rejimi hakkında genel bilgilendirme yapılmıştır. Katılma alacağı konusu ise ayrıntılı bir şekilde incelenmiştir. Ayrıca katılma alacağı konusunda tartışmalı noktalara yer verilerek hukuki niteliği incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Katılma alacağının özellikle zamanaşımı konusunda birçok görüş farklılığı bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca hesaplanma yönünde de bazı tartışmalı noktalar bulunmaktadır. Gerek doktrindeki gerekse Yargıtay’da bu sorunların önüne geçmek adına kanuni düzenlenmenin yapılması gerekmektedir.
With the entry into force of the regime of participation in acquired goods from 01.01.2002, there have been significant developments in the goods regime. Even though the regime of participating to acquired property has made significant benefits and gains in gender equality, it also has some difficulties in practice. The objective of presenting this paper is to analyze "Participation Asset" in accordance with the differences of opinion in doctrine and the decisions of the Supreme Court. Especially, different arguments on certain topics bring several problems in practice. Aim: This study, aimed to examine the issue of participation receivables, which came to an important point as a result of the change in the law, was adopted as a legal goods regime. Methodology: During the preparation of the study, a detailed explanation was given on the issues of the regime of participating to acquired property and the participation asset. The legal characteristics were scrutinized in consideration of the controversial topics on the participation asset. Findings: There are many differences of opinion regarding the statute of limitations of the participation fee. Furthermore, certain controversial topics on the calculation of the participation asset were also identified. Legal regulations should be made to prevent these problems both in the doctrine and the Supreme Court.
With the entry into force of the regime of participation in acquired goods from 01.01.2002, there have been significant developments in the goods regime. Even though the regime of participating to acquired property has made significant benefits and gains in gender equality, it also has some difficulties in practice. The objective of presenting this paper is to analyze "Participation Asset" in accordance with the differences of opinion in doctrine and the decisions of the Supreme Court. Especially, different arguments on certain topics bring several problems in practice. Aim: This study, aimed to examine the issue of participation receivables, which came to an important point as a result of the change in the law, was adopted as a legal goods regime. Methodology: During the preparation of the study, a detailed explanation was given on the issues of the regime of participating to acquired property and the participation asset. The legal characteristics were scrutinized in consideration of the controversial topics on the participation asset. Findings: There are many differences of opinion regarding the statute of limitations of the participation fee. Furthermore, certain controversial topics on the calculation of the participation asset were also identified. Legal regulations should be made to prevent these problems both in the doctrine and the Supreme Court.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Edinilmiş Mallara Katılma Rejimi, Katılma Alacağı, Tasfiye, Artık Değer, Regime of Participating to Acquired Property, Participation Asset, Liquidation, Residual Value
Kaynak
İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
21
Sayı
44
