Reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised

dc.contributor.authorVahip, Simavi
dc.contributor.authorAydemir, Ömer
dc.contributor.authorAkkaya, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorAltınbaş, Kürşat
dc.contributor.authorKora, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorSücüllüoğlu Dikici, Didem
dc.contributor.authorOral, E. Timuçin
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-21T15:53:50Z
dc.date.available2020-11-21T15:53:50Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesien_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 29192944en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised. Method: The study was carried out with 80 patients diagnosed with bipolar I disorder, 26 patients diagnosed with bipolar II disorder and 42 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder attending the out- and in-patient psychiatry departments of three university hospitals and one training hospital and 116 healthy volunteers consisting of university students. Mean duration of illness was 15.1 years for the bipolar disorder group and 9.3 years for the major depressive disorder group. For concurrent validity, the Mood Disorder Questionnaire was used. In the statistical analysis, internal consistency coefficient, item-total score correlation coefficients, exploratory factor analysis, correlation with concurrent scale and ROC curve were calculated. Results: Translation into Turkish and back-translation into English of Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised were performed and thus the semantic harmony of the scale was obtained. In the internal consistency, Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.914 and item-total score correlations were between 0.235-0.743. Unlike the rest, the coefficient of item #23 was found as 0.110. In factor analysis, six factors were obtained; however, a two-factor solution representing 44.5% of the total variance was accepted whereas the first factor represents overactivity and being expansive, where the second factor represents impulsivity and risky behaviors. Correlation of Hypomania Checklist-32-R with Mood Disorder Questionnaire was r=0.379. In the ROC analysis, the cutoffpoint of the scale was calculated as 14 with a sensitivity of 71.0 and specificity of 69.8. The scale discriminates well between the bipolar group, depressive and control groups. Conclusion: Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised developed for screening hypomania is reliable and valid in Turkish after exclusion of item #23.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5080/u13738en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-2163
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29192944en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85025114805en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5080/u13738
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11467/3696
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000406733900007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Association of Nervous and Mental Healthen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Psikiyatri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectChecklisten_US
dc.subjectHypomaniaen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.titleReliability and validity study of the Turkish version of Hypomania Checklist-32-Reviseden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
15046Hipomanisoruv4-enef3n.pdf
Boyut:
148.38 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama: