Residential satisfaction in formal and informal neighborhoods: The case of Istanbul, Turkey

dc.contributor.authorTürkoğlu, Handan
dc.contributor.authorTerzi, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorSalihoğlu, Tayfun
dc.contributor.authorBölen, Fulin
dc.contributor.authorOkumuş, Gökçer
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-21T15:54:37Z
dc.date.available2020-11-21T15:54:37Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose - Residential satisfaction can be viewed as a part of life satisfaction. There are many studies related to the relationship between residents' satisfaction with their environments and the quality of those environments. The purpose of this paper is to examine how this satisfaction differs according to the type of residential environment. Design/methodology/approach - It is based on empirical data on the quality of life in the different residential environments of the Istanbul Metropolitan Area. The primary source of information was a household survey. Findings - In an attempt to find solutions to problems with the quality of residential environments, the data were analyzed through several variables related to the subjective perceptions of residential satisfaction. According to the results of the research, residents living in planned neighborhoods in the city are more satisfied than those living in unplanned neighborhoods. The residents who live in the planned sections of the city are satisfied with the attractiveness and accessibility of their neighborhoods, while those who live in unplanned sections of the city are satisfied with their level of attachment to their neighborhoods. Practical implications - The study was designed to produce baseline data so that future changes in residential conditions as perceived by the residents of Istanbul could be monitored to support decisions for residential areas. Originality/value - Comparative case studies, especially on planned vs unplanned environments, are relatively limited in number. Therefore, there is a need for new researches examining differences between different residential settings within cities. This study adds value to the field of comparative studies on residential environments. © Emerald Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/ARCH-12-2018-0030en_US
dc.identifier.endpage132en_US
dc.identifier.issn2631-6862
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85062997712en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage112en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-12-2018-0030
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11467/3864
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000462975300008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchnet-IJARen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInformal housingen_US
dc.subjectIstanbulen_US
dc.subjectResidential qualityen_US
dc.subjectResidential satisfactionen_US
dc.titleResidential satisfaction in formal and informal neighborhoods: The case of Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
10-1108_ARCH-12-2018-0030.pdf
Boyut:
933.42 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama: