Green airport building certification comparison: a practical approach for airport management

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKacar, Betul
dc.contributor.authorTurhan, Eylem
dc.contributor.authorDalkiran, Alper
dc.contributor.authorKarakoc, T. Hikmet
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-19T10:46:35Z
dc.date.available2023-01-19T10:46:35Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.departmentRektörlük, Bilişim Teknolojileri Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, six certificates have proposed and three of them used by airport terminal building to analyze, measure, and score environmental damage were compared. Certifications handled in the study are LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method), CASBEE (Comprehensive Assessment for Building Environmental Efficiency), SBTool (Sustainable Building Tool), ACA (Airport Carbon Accreditation) and Green Airport and Green Company certificates. As a result, this research gathered the most widely used certificates in the literature. In addition, the Green Airport and Green Company certificate, the first green airport certificate in Turkiye, was added to the study for comparison, which has been offered just for airports. Hong Kong International Airport’s sustainability report was examined to determine how many points it would have received if it had applied for the most widely used LEED, BREEAM, and Green Airport and Green Company Certificates regarding the reported activities. The results have shown that the energy and atmosphere category is vital for all certification systems. Also, the study reveals that LEED gets 89.09 over 100 points, BREEAM 93.1 over 100 points, and Green Airport 75 over 100 points which display BREEAM to get a higher environmental response. This study aims to guide green building practices to decision-makers, which has become necessary in many countries. Employees and managers want to know the quality and quantity of sustainable tasks or planning at airports.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15435075.2022.2076236en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85131517951en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11467/6087
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2022.2076236
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000805719300001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Green Energyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGreen building rating systems; Airports; Airport terminals; green building certification; sustainability; sustainability applicationsen_US
dc.titleGreen airport building certification comparison: a practical approach for airport managementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Green Airport building certification comparison a practical approach for Airport Management.pdf
Boyut:
4.33 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.56 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu