Comparison of ranking results obtained by topsis and vikor methods, using the same criteria as times higher education world university ranking

dc.authorid0000-0003-3002-2983en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0924-4848en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-9430-8975en_US
dc.contributor.authorBağdatlı Kalkan, Seda
dc.contributor.authorTuranlı, Münevver
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, Ünal Halit
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-23T07:40:18Z
dc.date.available2019-10-23T07:40:18Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractNowadays, the increase of competition among universities on a local and global basis reveals for the individuals and institutions the need of ranking universities, considering many different comparable criteria with regard to universities. There are many different world universities rankings, prepared by different institutions for this purpose, and results of which are shared with public every year. In this study, firstly the history of university rankings in the world has been discussed and the rankings of the world universities according to the world university ranking criteria have been described. In the second part of the study, TOPSIS and VIKOR methods, the multicriteria decision making methods used in practice, have theoretically been explained. In the next section, the universities have been re-ranked according to the TOPSIS and VIKOR methods, using the same world university ranking criteria. At the consequence part of the study, the world university ranking has been evaluated comparing the world universities rankings each other, obtained according to TOPSIS and VIKOR methods. The purpose of this study is the application of the TOPSIS and VIKOR methods to reveal the university rankings, any relevant example of which haven’t been available in the literature, and to compare the findings of these rankings with those of the rankings obtained by THEWUR. Another aim of the study is to reveal whether ranking numbers vary in those performed by different methods. Based on the fact that university rankings do not differ according to methods using the same criteria and weights, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated and the results were evaluated.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage122en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage107en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11467/3056
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEJBSSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Business and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectThe World University Rankingen_US
dc.subjectTOPSISen_US
dc.subjectVIKORen_US
dc.subjectRankingen_US
dc.subjectWorld Universitiesen_US
dc.titleComparison of ranking results obtained by topsis and vikor methods, using the same criteria as times higher education world university rankingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
A.9.pdf
Boyut:
334.75 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.56 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: