Popülizm-Demokrasi İlişkisi: Latin Amerika’dan Örnekler
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2019
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Latin Amerika, popu?lizm çalışan araştırmacılar açısından önemli bir araştırma alanı olarak ortaya çıkıyor. Du?nyanın bu bölgesinde, popu?lizmin farklı tu?rlerine rasgelmek mu?mku?n. Üstelik Latin Amerika’da, tarih boyunca, popu?list liderlerin siyasal gu?cu? ele geçirmeyi başardıkları söylenebilir. Elinizdeki çalışma, popu?lizm ve demokrasi arasındaki çatışmalı ilişkiyi incelemek niyetindedir. Bunu yaparken popu?lizm bir siyasal tarz olarak ve liderin merkezi rolu?ne referansla tanımlanacaktır. Bu doğrultuda, Arjantin’de Peron dönemi klasik popu?lizmi, Peru’da Fujimori’nin sağ popu?lizmi ve nihayetinde Venezu?ella’da Chavez’in sol popu?lizminin analizinin göstereceği u?zere demokrasi ve popu?lizm ilişkisi farklı popu?lizmlerin varlığına rağmen bu?yu?k ölçu?de aynı kalmıştır. Bu doğrultuda denilebilir ki popu?lizm, demokrasinin içerici kapasitesini artırmış, buna karşın, anayasal denetim mekanizmalarına, demokratik kurumlara ve genel anlamda liberal demokrasiye zarar vermiştir.
Latin America, as a region, reflects a relevant field of analysis for scholars who aim at working populism. Here, in this region of the world, it is possible to encounter various types of populism(s). Additionally, throughout the history of Latin America, populist leaders have managed to accumulate political power for decades. This study, in its turn, aims at analyzing the relationship between populism and democracy. It suggests analyzing populism as a political style prioritizing the central role of populist leaders. In this perspective, it overviews a historical analysis of different Latin American countries where various types of populism were in power. In this respect, the study of the classical populism of Peron in Argentina, the right-wing populism of Fujimori in Peru and the left-wing populism of Chavez in Venezuela demonstrate that the relationship between democracy and “various” populisms remains almost the same. Populism, in general, enlarges inclusionary capacities of democratic regimes while giving permanent harm to democratic institutions, constitutional mechanisms of control and liberal democracy in general.
Latin America, as a region, reflects a relevant field of analysis for scholars who aim at working populism. Here, in this region of the world, it is possible to encounter various types of populism(s). Additionally, throughout the history of Latin America, populist leaders have managed to accumulate political power for decades. This study, in its turn, aims at analyzing the relationship between populism and democracy. It suggests analyzing populism as a political style prioritizing the central role of populist leaders. In this perspective, it overviews a historical analysis of different Latin American countries where various types of populism were in power. In this respect, the study of the classical populism of Peron in Argentina, the right-wing populism of Fujimori in Peru and the left-wing populism of Chavez in Venezuela demonstrate that the relationship between democracy and “various” populisms remains almost the same. Populism, in general, enlarges inclusionary capacities of democratic regimes while giving permanent harm to democratic institutions, constitutional mechanisms of control and liberal democracy in general.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Uluslararası İlişkiler, Siyasi Bilimler
Kaynak
International journal of political science & urban studies (online)
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
7
Sayı
2
