Valiyeva, KamalaAsal, Uğur Yasin2021-05-202021-05-202021https://hdl.handle.net/11467/4945One of the main determinants that indelibly influence China’s foreign policy vision and behavior, as well as the ideational structure of Chinese self-perception is the factor of history. China’s foreign policy and its strategy of global rise are characterized by a combination of constancy and change in a continuum. This paper attempted to substantiate the idea that as a rising power or as Henry Kissinger put it a returning power China’s foreign policy identity and behavior are determined by its historical past. China exists and evolves in the shadow of its past experiences. Both the domestic political narrative and the foreign policy strategy of a rising China contain numerous references to the historical experience of the Chinese nation. This appeal to history is most fully projected in Xi Jinping’s “Chinese Dream” concept, the realization of which is supposed to accelerate the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation”. By outlining the evolution of China’s foreign policy approaches in a retrospective manner this paper summarizes the existing conceptual accounts of Chinese foreign policy and the phenomenon of China’s global rise. In doing so the paper differentiates existing theoretical approaches into two categories of conventional and eclectic theorizing with a specific focus on the dichotomy of “revisionism” and “adherence to the status quo” in relation to the existing structure and principles of the international system.????? ?? ???????? ?????????????, ???????????? ?????????????????? ??????? ? ????????? ?????, ? ????? ??????? ???????? ?????????? ?????????????? ???????? ?????? ???????. ??????? ???????? ????? ? ??? ????????? ??????? ??????????????? ????????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ? ????????? ? ??????????. ? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????????? ??????? ?????????? ???? ? ???, ??? ?????????????????? ???????????? ? ????????? ?????, ??? ????????????? ??? ?? ????????? ????? ???????????, ?????????????? ????, ???????????? ??? ???????????? ???????. ??? ?????????????????? ????????, ??? ? ?????????????????? ????????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????, ????????????? ? ?????????????? «? ???? ?????? ????????», ???????? ????????? ?????? ?? ???????????? ???? ????????? ?????, ???????? ????? ?????????????? ? ????????? ???????????? ??? ?? ????????? «????????? ?????», ????????????? ???????, ??? ??????????????, ?????? ???????? ? «???????? ????????????? ???????????» ?????? ? ?????. ??????? ? ??????????????? ??????? ??????? ???????? ?????????????????? ???????? ????? ? ??????? ?????????? ??? ?????? ?? ???????????? ???, ?????? ??????????? ??????? ???????????? ???????????? ?????????????? ??????? ? ???????????? ??????? ???????? ? ???????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????, ?????????? ???????? ?? ????????? ???????????? ? ?????????????? ??????-??? ? ????????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ? ???????? ???????????? ????????????? ?????????? ?? ??? ?????????: ???????????????? ? ??????????? ????????????????. ??????????????, ??? ?????????? ??????????? ????? ? ??? ?????? ? ????????? ??????????? ?? ????????? ? ???????? ????????????? ?????????????? ??????? ??????????????? ? ????????? ?????????? ????? ??? «??????» ? ??? «???????????»otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessForeign PolicyChinaHistorical ContinuumInternational Relations TheoriesGlobal Riseя Политика КитаяИсторический КонтинуумТеории Международных ОтношенийГлобальное ВозвышениеTheorizing Chinese foreign policy: Conceptual tenets in historical continuumТеоретизация Внешней Политики Китая: Концептуальные Положения в Историческом КонтинуумеArticle10213891408465727